Will AI Replace Architects?

AI technology has been making significant advancements, leading to concerns about its impact on various industries, including architecture. Investment bank Goldman Sachs predicts that AI could replace 300 million jobs across all industries globally. In a survey by design technology firm RevitGods, it was found that 55% of US architects are moderately concerned about being replaced by AI.

While some believe that AI will eventually replace a substantial portion of architects’ work, others are more skeptical. Commenters in the discussion expressed doubts about the immediate threat of AI taking over architectural jobs. They pointed out that despite AI’s advancements, the technology is still not capable of replicating the creativity and uniqueness that human architects bring to their designs.

Some commenters also argued that the human touch in architecture will always be in demand. They emphasized that people are increasingly seeking craft, hand-made, and human-made designs instead of soulless and mass-produced buildings. They believe that while AI may be efficient at producing certain types of buildings, it cannot replace architects with unique vision and creativity.

Overall, the debate revolves around the balance between AI technology and human creativity in architecture. While AI continues to advance, it is unlikely to fully replace architects in the foreseeable future.

The Morphogenesis-designed Surat Diamond Bourse in India has become the largest office building globally, surpassing the Pentagon. The 660,000-square-meter building was created to accommodate the world’s largest community of diamond traders.

Opinions on the building were divided in the comments section. Some considered it a monstrosity, while others praised its sculptural qualities. Some critics argued that the building holds no intrinsic value for diamond traders and labeled it as soulless and an architectural disaster. They criticized the choice of multiple styles in the design and suggested a more unified approach.

The debate surrounding the Surat Diamond Bourse underscores differing opinions on architectural aesthetics and whether the building successfully fulfills its purpose.

A new 12-storey office building in Manhattan’s Chelsea neighborhood, designed by SOM and clad in black-glazed terracotta, sparked discussion among commenters. Overall, opinions on the building were positive, with many finding it cool, elegant, and respectful of its context.

Some commenters drew comparisons to Herzog & de Meuron’s 253 40 Bond residential building in NoHo and appreciated the sobriety of the design in contrast to a potentially chaotic mix of facades. Others praised it for being in line with the architectural style that is appropriate for New York. However, one commenter found fault with the rhythmic subtlety of the terracotta facade, comparing it unfavorably to the gold standard set by Herzog & de Meuron.

In general, commenters appreciated the building’s contribution to the architectural landscape in New York, with one commenter humorously noting that “nothing says New York like glazed black terracotta.”

The discussion reflects a diversity of opinions on architectural aesthetics and the success of the SOM design in relation to its surroundings.

Note: This rewrite has been edited for word count and to include only the essential information requested.